We openly acknowledge the risks of the transition period and describe mechanisms to minimize them:
Risk of Power Concentration
Problem: Founders may not want to transfer governance.
Protection: Transition criteria are objective and public. Delay of decentralization without objective reasons will become obvious to the community. Reputational mechanisms and transparency make abuse unprofitable.
Risk of Technical Errors
Problem: Vulnerabilities in smart contracts or infrastructure.
Protection: Independent audit, open source, phased deployment, bug bounty program, backup mechanisms.
Risk of External Pressure
Problem: States or organizations may oppose the project.
Protection: Decentralized architecture eliminates a single point of attack. Legal structure is distributed across jurisdictions. Transparency of activities reduces grounds for persecution.
Risk of Community Apathy
Problem: Participants may not participate in governance.
Protection: Vote delegation mechanisms, reputation system, gradual involvement through working groups, educational programs.