The Earthlings Treasury

The decentralized financial mechanism of the Earthlings people

This document sets out in detail section 03 of the Charter. Where they diverge, the Charter applies; where the Charter diverges from the Declaration, the Declaration applies. Thresholds, quorums, and periods are laid down by the Charter; this document reproduces them and cannot change them.

The Earthlings Treasury is the people's financial mechanism, governed through voting in the DAO Assembly and transparent procedures. It is the basis for delivering projects, developing the platform, running educational initiatives, and providing humanitarian aid.

SECTION 01. Foundations and purpose

Article 1. Definition and status

Key characteristics:

  • governance exclusively through voting in the DAO Assembly;
  • transparency of all financial transactions in a distributed ledger;
  • automatic execution of decisions as smart contracts are deployed;
  • administrative rights minimized, distributed among elected signatories, and operating through a timelock;
  • public reporting in real time.

The state of the keys at the structure-formation stage. The keys are held by the founder. Transferring them to a multisignature of elected Core Nodes or to the control of the DAO is a criterion for moving to the next phase of the Roadmap. After the transfer, no one will be able to dispose of funds single-handedly; at the structure-formation stage this restriction is secured procedurally, and we state this plainly rather than pass over it.

Article 2. Purpose

  • Funding projects - support for initiatives directed at the people's aims
  • Developing the platform - technical infrastructure and its improvement
  • Educational programmes - opportunities for participants to learn and develop
  • Humanitarian aid - emergency support and social initiatives
  • Reserving funds - a financial buffer for crisis situations

Article 3. Fundamental principles

Transparency. The movement of funds is verifiable in real time by any person, without our involvement.

Democracy. All decisions on the allocation of funds are taken by a vote of the DAO Assembly on the principle of one person, one vote. The weight of a vote does not depend on the amount of funds contributed under any circumstances.

Autonomy. As they are deployed, smart contracts execute decisions automatically, which narrows the space for manipulation and subjective control.

Accountability. Every funded project publishes reports on the spending of funds at the end of each stage.

Current state. The treasury is held in a Safe wallet on the Polygon network (0xaEC7016218f7883bf6e47a2C932FdE6d822086C0); its transactions are public and verifiable. The signature threshold on this wallet is still one: the key is with the founder, and there is no multisignature yet. This is verifiable at the address by any person, and we say it ourselves. The move to a multisignature of the elected is a criterion for moving between phases of the Roadmap. The Treasury smart contracts described in Article 20 are being deployed in stages; until they are deployed, the corresponding rules are executed procedurally rather than automatically. The Core Nodes and the Emergency Multisig have not been elected as of today.

SECTION 02. Sources of funds

The principal source is the one-time contribution on entry, equivalent to 79 USD. This is a single payment: after the passport is received there are no annual or monthly payments. The contribution covers the cost of identity verification and passport issuance, goes to the Treasury, and is spent under the rules of Article 9.

The contribution on entry should be distinguished from voluntary contributions and donations.

Article 3 bis. Paying for another

The contribution for a person may be made not by them but by another person or by the Treasury. There is no exemption from the contribution: it is always paid in full; all that changes is who pays.

An open queue. A person who cannot make the contribution themselves joins an open queue by a single action. Neither a statement, nor proof, nor an explanation of reasons is required of them, and none may be required. Only the sequence number and the date of joining are published in the queue; no information about the person is published there.

Order of payment. Payment is made for whoever is at the head of the queue. A particular person cannot be chosen: the possibility of choosing creates relations of patronage incompatible with the equality of participants. The payer is not told whom they paid for; the person paid for is not told who made the contribution for them.

Equality of passports. The registry does not record by whom a contribution was made. A passport paid for by another person is in no way different from any other, and paying for another entails no consequences for status, vote, or participation.

Who may pay. Any person, whether or not they belong to the Earthlings people. The payer's name is published at their choice; anonymous payment is permitted.

The Treasury as payer. The Assembly is entitled to set a share of incoming contributions to be directed to paying the queue. The share is published, applied automatically, and changed by decision of the Assembly. Until a share is set, the queue is paid only by people.

Reporting. The length of the queue, the number of contributions paid in a period, and the amount directed to this by the Treasury are published. Information making it possible to identify those in the queue is never published.

Article 4. Voluntary contributions

Any earthling may make a voluntary contribution at any time - in the unit of account, in cryptocurrency, or in fiat through approved partner channels.

Contributions are entirely voluntary. Their absence does not affect earthling status, the vote, or access to anything.

Article 5. Grants and donations

The Treasury may accept grants and donations from external organizations subject to the following conditions:

  • Transparency of source - information about the donor is published unless they have chosen to remain anonymous; where a donation is anonymous, the fact of receipt and the amount are published without identifying the source;
  • No conditions - grants must contain no conditions contrary to the principles of the people;
  • No influence - donors receive neither a vote nor influence over the decisions of the DAO. The size of a donation gives nothing beyond thanks.

Anti-money-laundering. The Treasury provides no financial services to third parties and disposes only of the people's own funds, but it accepts external receipts and works through an instrument legal entity, and therefore falls within the requirements of the relevant jurisdictions. Accordingly: fiat operations pass through the banking channels of the legal entity and are subject to its customer-verification procedures; large and atypical receipts are checked as to source before acceptance, and an anonymous donation exceeding the threshold set by the Assembly is not accepted; donations from persons and organizations under sanctions restrictions are not accepted in any form. The threshold and the verification procedure are set by decision of the Assembly and published.

Article 6. Issuance of the unit of account

Part of the funds is formed through the controlled issuance of the unit of account under the model approved by the DAO Assembly. The details are in a separate document.

  • issuance is governed by transparent rules written into a smart contract;
  • changing the rules requires a qualified majority;
  • funds from issuance go directly to the Treasury;
  • issuance is subject to public audit.

Article 7. Transfers from the profit of Cells

5 per cent of a Cell's profit goes to the Treasury.

  • transfers are made through smart contracts as they are deployed;
  • the calculation is transparent and verifiable;
  • funds arrive directly, without intermediaries;
  • the transfer may be made in the unit of account, in fiat, or in stablecoin.

Use: common infrastructure, educational initiatives, help for new Cells, the strategic aims of the people.

Article 8. Other sources

The DAO Assembly may approve additional sources subject to transparency and independence: income from paid platform services, technology licensing, returns from successful funded projects, and other sources by decision of a qualified majority.

SECTION 03. Budget allocation

Article 9. Structure of the annual budget

The annual budget is allocated across five categories. The proportions are changed only by a qualified majority of the DAO Assembly.

ShareCategoryContent
25%PlatformServers, development, smart-contract audit, security, user experience
30%Growth and communicationsInformation campaigns, content, media work, community growth, events and partnerships
20%Community projectsFunding of projects approved by a DAO vote
15%EducationResearch, educational programmes, documentation, publications
10%Reserve fundA buffer for crisis situations, technical failures, volatility, and legal defence

Article 10. Allocation by support

When several projects have passed the threshold of approval but the category's funds are not enough for all of them, the order of funding is determined as follows (Charter, Article 11):

  1. Every earthling marks all the projects they consider worth funding - whether just one or all of them. The number of marks is not limited and costs nothing.
  2. The number of marks for each project is counted.
  3. Projects are funded in descending order of the number of marks until the category's annual limit is exhausted.
  4. Projects that receive no funding in the current cycle retain their approval and take part in the next allocation without a further vote.

Why not quadratic voting. It expresses the strength of a preference: a participant allocates a budget of credits and can put more weight into a project that matters to them than another participant does. Even with equal budgets this means that a vote can be concentrated.

The whole construction of the people stands on the opposite: a vote is not accumulated, not spent, and not exchanged. A mechanism allowing one person to cast more weight in a single decision than another contradicts Article 37 of the Charter and Article 40 of this document, and is therefore not applied.

In allocation by support, priority is formed from the number of people who supported a project, not from who pressed harder.

It is applied to the quarterly allocation of funds among competing projects, to grant programmes with many applications, and to prioritizing directions of development.

Article 11. The reserve fund

The reserve fund is formed from the share of the annual budget allocated to it. Funds are used only in emergency situations with the approval of a qualified majority of the DAO Assembly:

  • covering technical failures and critical errors;
  • protection against volatility;
  • emergency support in force majeure;
  • legal defence of the people.

The target size is the equivalent of the annual budget. Once the threshold is reached, additional receipts are allocated across the main categories.

SECTION 04. Governance and voting

Article 12. The sole body

The DAO Assembly is the sole body governing the Treasury. All decisions on the allocation of funds, on changing the rules, and on strategic development are taken exclusively by its vote.

One person, one vote. The weight of a vote does not depend on the amount of funds contributed, on reputation, or on length of participation.

Article 13. Reputation

Factors: regularity of participation in votes, successful delivery of funded projects, contribution to the development of the community, the quality of proposals, assessments by other participants.

Use: reference information when choosing a delegate; a chronological feed of proposals, in which the author's reputation does not affect a proposal's place in the feed, and filtering by reputation is available as a viewing mode each person switches on for themselves.

What reputation does not do: the list is laid down exhaustively in the Charter, Article 8. Applied to funding, this means that the order of funding is determined by the number of supporters, not by the applicant's reputation.

Article 14. Delegation

Earthlings may voluntarily transfer their vote in a particular area to another participant. The rules are laid down by Article 7 of the Charter and are reproduced here:

  • by area only - a subject category or a particular Cell; delegating across all questions at once is impossible;
  • no self-delegation and no chains - checked technically;
  • a ceiling - 5 per cent of participants, but no fewer than 10 delegators;
  • one active delegation per area;
  • revocation at any time - in one step, without giving reasons and without the consent of the person the vote was given to;
  • any earthling may be a delegate - reputation neither opens nor closes access to this possibility;
  • all votes cast by a delegate are public.

Delegation does not apply in votes on amending the Charter and the basic Treasury rules, on funding above 100,000 EC, on forming the Emergency Multisig, on restricting powers, on annulling a passport, and on changing the unamendable principles.

Delegation creates no additional influence: one delegated vote equals one vote, and it creates no office.

Article 15. Types of vote

DecisionThresholdQuorumDiscussionVoting
Funding up to 10,000 EC51%20%14 days7 days
Funding of 10,000-100,000 EC67%20%14 days7 days
Funding above 100,000 EC67%25%21 days14 days
Changing the basic Treasury rules67%25%21 days14 days
Amending the Charter67%25%21 days14 days
Emergency technical decisions51%20%-48 hours
Expedited procedure up to 1,000 EC51%20%3 days3 days

The threshold amounts are set by decision of the DAO Assembly and are changed without amending the Charter; the values given are those in force when this document was adopted.

Article 16. Conflict of interest

Mandatory recusal. An earthling does not take part in a vote on the allocation of funds if they have an interest in its outcome. The closed list of grounds for recusal and the procedure for declaring it are laid down by the Charter, Article 16.

No other grounds for excluding a vote exist: an earthling's vote is not excluded from the count by decision of a majority.

Declaration of connections. When submitting an application, the initiator is obliged to name all participants connected with the project. This information is published together with the application.

Openness. Votes on the allocation of funds are open as a general rule: everyone sees how others voted. This creates a mechanism of mutual control where common money is at stake.

Article 17. Submitting and considering projects

Stage 1. Submission. Any earthling submits a funding proposal. Neither prior approval nor a threshold of support is required. The application contains a description, aims, budget, plan, the participants involved, and success metrics. The proposal is published for open discussion.

Stage 2. Discussion. 14 days; 3 days for projects up to 1,000 EC. Questions to the authors, feedback, the opportunity to revise.

Stage 3. Voting. Under the periods and thresholds of Article 15. Every earthling has one vote. Results are recorded publicly.

Stage 4. Delivery. On approval, funds are released automatically as smart contracts are deployed. Funding may be staged. Public reporting is mandatory at each stage.

Article 18. Staged funding

Projects with a budget above 25,000 EC are funded in stages: 30 per cent on approval, 40 on reaching intermediate goals, 30 on successful completion.

Moving to the next stage requires a public report on the completion of the previous one, confirmation that the goals were reached, and approval by a simple majority of the DAO Assembly.

If a stage is not completed, funding stops and unused funds are returned to the Treasury.

SECTION 05. Governance structure

Article 19. The DAO Assembly

The Assembly comprises all verified Earthlings and is the sole body taking decisions on the Treasury.

Powers: approving projects and grants; changing budget proportions; approving the annual budget; forming the Core Nodes and the Emergency Multisig; changing the rules for governing the Treasury; strategic decisions.

Article 20. Smart contracts

Operations are built on smart contracts. Deployment is staged; as of today none of them is deployed:

  • Treasury Contract - holding and allocating funds;
  • Voting Contract - organizing votes and counting;
  • Project Funding Contract - automatic release of funds on approval;
  • Reserve Fund Contract - managing reserves.

Rules for all contracts: an independent security audit before operations are expanded; publication with open source code as deployment proceeds; changes only by a qualified majority; publication on the blockchain for verification.

Article 21. Core Nodes

A group of up to 6 technical specialists elected by the DAO Assembly to keep the platform and infrastructure running. They perform strictly technical functions and have no decision-making powers.

Functions: support of the platform and infrastructure; cybersecurity; technical support of votes; audit and monitoring of smart contracts; fixing technical failures; technical administration of communication tools.

Prohibited: taking decisions on behalf of the people; blocking participants for the content of what they say; managing finances or influencing the allocation of funds; holding special weight in votes; interfering with the content of discussions - a technical restriction is possible only during attacks such as spam bots or DDoS.

Formation and control:

  • election by a DAO vote with a simple majority (51%, quorum 20%);
  • rotation every 6 months;
  • recall by a simple majority (51%, quorum 20%) at any time, without giving reasons;
  • mandatory monthly public reporting.

Symmetry of thresholds. The threshold for recall equals the threshold for election: removing someone from a mandate cannot be harder than appointing them (Charter, Article 2). Rotation is not linked to reputational indicators: reputation is a condition neither of nomination nor of retaining a mandate.

Article 22. Emergency Multisig

A multisignature wallet of six participants for urgent technical operations in critical situations. A composition of fewer than six is not permitted: with a smaller composition the five-sixths share rounds up to the whole composition, and a single unavailable key would block any contract upgrade (Charter, Article 3).

Powers are strictly limited: suspending smart contracts on critical vulnerabilities; emergency measures during cyberattacks; urgent technical fixes; emergency funding of up to 5,000 EC in force majeure, with mandatory subsequent confirmation by the DAO.

Control:

  • a 24-hour timelock on all transactions except responses to an active attack;
  • all actions are publicly visible in real time;
  • a mandatory public report within 48 hours;
  • the DAO may reverse any action by a simple majority;
  • every action is confirmed by the Assembly within 7 days or is reversed.

Formation: election by a simple majority of the DAO; rotation every 12 months, with at least two of its members replaced; recall by a simple majority at any time.

No reputational requirements are set for nomination: the choice is made by the Assembly.

Article 23. Technical development contractor

By decision of the DAO Assembly a legal entity may be established to act as the contractor for technical development and to conclude agreements with outside suppliers.

Current status: not established; it will be created as needed under this Article.

Such an entity is an instrument of execution, separate from the elected technical coordinators, the Core Nodes; a coincidence of names would not endow the coordinators with corporate or financial powers.

Functions: concluding contracts with suppliers; coordinating the work of outside specialists; securing the legal validity of contractual relations; administering payments in accordance with approved budgets; quality control of the work.

Funding - exclusively from the "Platform" category.

Reporting: publication of all contracts concluded; a public register of suppliers and work performed; transparency of all transactions.

The contractor takes no decisions on behalf of the people; its functions are limited to technical implementation.

SECTION 06. Risk management

Article 24. Composition of reserves

The purpose of operations with assets. The Treasury does not seek to generate income from operations with assets. Conversions and the distribution across asset classes are carried out solely in order to secure sufficient funds for current expenses and resilience to exchange-rate fluctuations. The Treasury is neither an asset-management fund nor an investment intermediary.

The Treasury's reserves are formed from external assets:

  • 60-80% - stablecoins;
  • 20-40% - the largest cryptocurrencies, used as a store of value over a long horizon.

Changing the proportions requires a qualified majority of the DAO Assembly.

Why the people's unit of account is not part of the reserves. The unit of account is an internal instrument of coordination and mutual aid, not a reserve asset. Including it in reserves would mean that the Treasury's stability depends on the value of what it issues itself - a construction that collapses exactly when reserves are needed most. Besides, the share of the people's own unit in reserves is measurable only if a market exists, and there is no market and no exchange trading in the unit of account.

Funds denominated in the unit of account are accounted for separately from the reserves - as internal turnover, not as backing.

Article 25. Financial risks

  • volatility - reduced by the composition of reserves and by the reserve fund;
  • counterparty risk - reduced by working with tested protocols and venues;
  • liquidity - part of the reserves is held in highly liquid forms.

Article 26. Technical risks

Smart-contract exploits; loss of funds through technical errors; risks of the external protocols in which funds are placed.

SECTION 07. External organizations

Article 27. Principles of partnership

Transparency - all agreements are published. Independence - partners gain no influence over the decisions of the DAO. Alignment with values - partners share the principles of the Declaration. Mutual benefit. No exclusivity - the Treasury concludes no exclusive agreements.

Article 28. Procedure for accepting grants

  1. Publication of the offer - the grantor, the amount, the conditions.
  2. Verification. The circumstances of the grantor and the conditions of the grant are examined by an open working group whose composition is not limited; where the Independent Council has been formed, it is entitled to publish its own opinion. Neither the group nor the Council takes decisions, and neither can block acceptance of a grant.
  3. Discussion - 14 days to assess possible conflicts of interest.
  4. Voting - 7 days, simple majority.
  5. Public acceptance - funds are credited with full transparency as to source.

It is prohibited to accept grants from organizations connected with arms production or with military operations; from companies with proven human rights violations; from structures financing political parties and campaigns; from sources whose funds are of opaque origin.

Article 29. Joint projects

Funding is divided in proportion to the parties' contributions; governance is on a parity basis; results remain openly accessible; each party retains independence in taking decisions; the agreement may be terminated by either party on 30 days' notice.

SECTION 08. Limits and prohibitions

Article 30. Prohibited activities

It is prohibited to fund projects connected with:

  • the production or distribution of weapons;
  • financing military conflicts or terrorist organizations;
  • violation of human rights or discrimination;
  • exploitation of child labour or any harm to children;
  • activity unlawful in any jurisdiction;
  • environmental damage;
  • participation in political struggle and influence on elections;
  • fraud or pyramid schemes;
  • the spread of disinformation or hate propaganda.

A breach entails immediate termination of funding and return of the funds.

Article 31. Funding limits

  • one project - no more than 10 per cent of the category's annual budget;
  • one Cell - no more than 3 active projects at the same time;
  • one earthling - no more than 2 active projects in which they are the applicant or the person responsible for reporting.

Exceptions are possible only with the approval of a qualified majority of the DAO in special circumstances.

SECTION 09. Crisis management

Article 32. Economic crises

If the value of reserves falls by more than half or liquidity is lost, the DAO may take emergency measures: temporary suspension of new projects; a temporary change of budget proportions; drawing on the reserve fund; reduction of the budgets of active projects with the consent of the teams; temporary paid services to replenish funds.

All emergency measures require a qualified majority and last no more than 90 days, with the possibility of extension by the same procedure.

Article 33. Technical crises

In the event of an exploit, a break-in, or loss of access to funds: immediate suspension through the Emergency Multisig; a damage assessment report within 6 hours; a recovery plan within 24 hours; an emergency DAO vote within 48 hours; use of the reserve fund if necessary; a public analysis of the causes and of preventive measures.

Article 34. Legal crises

In the event of asset freezes, lawsuits, or prohibitions: distribution of funds across several jurisdictions; use of part of the reserve fund for legal defence; creation of backup instrument legal entities; public information about the situation; coordination with other organizations.

Actions in the legal sphere taken at short notice are performed under a protective legal mandate, granted and revoked by the Assembly by a simple majority (Charter, Article 33).

The principle of resilience: the Treasury is designed to keep working when part of the assets are frozen or prohibitions apply in particular jurisdictions.

SECTION 10. Reporting and metrics

Article 35. Public reporting

The Treasury publishes a quarterly financial report and an annual summary report, available to all.

Financial metrics: the total size of the Treasury; the actual allocation across categories; the size of the reserve fund; the composition of reserves.

Project metrics: the number of projects approved and successfully delivered; the share of stages completed on time.

Participation metrics: the share of those who took part in votes; the average quorum; the number of new proposals; delegation activity.

Sustainability metrics: change in the size of the fund over the period; volatility of reserves; the environmental footprint of funded projects.

Article 36. Annual report

The financial part of the annual report is generated automatically from public records and requires no one's interpretation: any participant can reproduce it themselves.

The analytical part - an assessment of whether aims were achieved, of the effectiveness of governance, and recommendations - is prepared by the Independent Council as part of its annual report on the state of the people (Charter, Article 4). Until the Council is formed, the analytical part may be prepared by an open working group; its conclusions are advisory.

The Core Nodes are not involved in preparing Treasury reporting: their functions are limited to technical ones, and assessing the spending of funds is not a technical function.

Article 37. Criteria of success

CriterionBenchmarkMeasurement
Participation in votesabove 30%share of participants in an average vote
Project successabove 70%share of projects that met their stated aims
Financial resiliencereserve equal to the annual budgetsize of reserves relative to the annual budget
Composition of reservesconformity with Article 24actual distribution
Transparencyall transactions verifiableverification through a blockchain explorer

The values given are benchmarks for assessment, not obligations of the people to anyone.

SECTION 11. Amending this document

Article 38. Procedure

The document is amended only by a vote of the DAO Assembly: a proposal from any earthling; discussion of no fewer than 21 days; voting for 14 days by a qualified majority with a quorum of no fewer than 25 per cent; entry into force 7 days after approval.

Article 39. Types of amendment

TypeThresholdQuorumDiscussion
Technical clarifications with no change of meaning51%20%7 days
Procedural changes67%25%21 days
Substantial changes to the budget structure or to powers67%25%21 days
Changing the unamendable principlesimpossible--

An amendment contradicting the Charter cannot be put to a vote, and if adopted has no force.

Article 40. Unamendable principles

The following are not changed even by a qualified majority:

  • governance of the Treasury exclusively through the DAO Assembly;
  • one person, one vote in taking any financial decision, including the allocation of funds among projects; no mechanism may allow one participant to cast more weight in a single decision than another;
  • transparency of all financial transactions of the Treasury;
  • the prohibition on funding the activities listed in Article 30;
  • the technical and service character of the Core Nodes and the Emergency Multisig;
  • the independence of the vote from the amount of funds contributed.

What is listed here is the operational expression of the unamendable core of the Declaration and of Article 37 of the Charter, cannot narrow it, and is construed only in its favour.