Theoretisch-mathematisches Rahmenwerk

1.1. Ein Volk jenseits von Territorium und Staat

Die klassische politische und rechtliche Tradition betrachtet ein Volk, eine Nation oder eine Ethnie als eine Gemeinschaft, die auf einer Kombination von Territorium, Sprache, Geschichte, Kultur und politischer Organisation basiert. Der Staat fungiert als Träger der Souveränität, und das Volk als Gesamtheit seiner Bürger.

Im Kontext einer globalisierten und digitalen Welt erweist sich ein solches Verständnis als unzureichend. Ein erheblicher Teil menschlicher Interaktionen:

• ist nicht an ein bestimmtes Territorium gebunden;
• erfolgt über verteilte digitale Netzwerke;
• erstreckt sich über eine einzelne Jurisdiktion hinaus;
• bildet stabile Gemeinschaften ohne einen einzelnen Staat.

Es entsteht der Bedarf nach einem Modell eines Volkes, das:

• nicht mit Staatsbürgerschaft zusammenfällt;
• sich nicht auf nationale Grenzen stützt;
• keinen monopolistischen Staatsapparat hat;
• dennoch über innere Struktur, Normen und Verfahren verfügt.

Das Earthlings-Volk wird als eine solche transnationale Gemeinschaft betrachtet.

1.2. Theoretische Grundlagen: Netzwerkgesellschaften

Modern Netzwerk society theory (Castells, 1996, 2000; Barabási, 2002) asserts that the key configuration of social connections becomes the Netzwerk: a distributed Struktur in which:

• multiple nodes (actors) are connected by a variable number of links;
• there is no mandatory center;
• high Resilienz to failures is possible;
• emergent order arises without centralized planning.

Network societies are characterized by:

• horizontal coordination;
• ability to rapidly adapt to changes;
• possibility of growth without rigid hierarchy;
• multiple channels of information transmission.

Das Earthlings-Volk naturally fits into the Netzwerk society paradigm: it forms as a multitude of interconnected Subjekts and Zelles (local groups), coordinated not through a power pyramid, but through DAO Verfahrens and digital infraStruktur.

1.3. Theorien komplexer Systeme und Selbstorganisation

Complex Systems theories (Kauffman, 1993; Holland, 1995; Mitchell, 2009) demonstrate that stable Strukturs can form "bottom-up" — through local interactions of multiple elements governed by relatively simple rules. Self-organizing Systems:

• do not erfordern an external control center;
• exhibit emergent properties;
• possess high adaptability;
• can maintain Stabilität under external perturbations.

Das Earthlings-Volk is understood as a complex adaptive System in which:

• Subjekts (individual Earthlings) make choices and interact according to common rules;
• Zelles serve as local coordination centers;
• DAO formalizes collective Entscheidung-making Verfahrens;
• the internal economy (Earthlings Coin) unterstützens motivation and coordination.

1.4. Transnationale Identität

Contemporary research shows that a person's belonging to a Gemeinschaft is increasingly determined not by place of birth or residence, but by inclusion in certain Netzwerks of meanings, values, and practices. Transnational identity emerges where people share:

• common beliefs and norms;
• a common vision of the future;
• Teilnahme in common Institutional Strukturs;
• a sense of "we" not reducible to the state.

Das Earthlings-Volk relies precisely on such transnational identity. It forms a superStruktur over existing citizenships: a person remains a citizen of their state but voluntarily acquires the additional status of Earthling, which does not conflict with national obligations.

1.5. Digitale Infrastruktur als neue Form der Institutionalität

Digital protocols, kryptographisch tools, verteiltes Ledgers, and biometric technologies create the possibility of forming Institutions that:

• are independent of the state;
• do not erfordern a central registrar;
• gewährleisten provable Subjekt uniqueness;
• ermöglichen building collective Entscheidung-making Verfahrens in a distributed environment.

For the Earthlings-Volk, digital infraStruktur is not an auxiliary tool but a necessary condition of existence: without it, neither proving Subjekt uniqueness, nor ensuring equal Teilnahme, nor building a sustainable dezentralisiert Governance System is possible.

1.6. Das Problem der nachweisbaren Identität

Any Institutional System claiming the status of a sustainable Subjekt must address the question of identity: who is a Teilnehmer, how to prove their reality and uniqueness, how to guarantee that each person is represented in the System exactly once.

In traditional models, this function is performed by:

• state citizen registries;
• Passs and other Dokuments;
• centralized Datenbanks.

For a people existing outside the state, a different Mechanismus is erfordernd. It must gewährleisten:

• biometric uniqueness;
• verifiability and absence of duplicates;
• minimization of persönliche Daten storage;
• Compliance with international Datenschutz schützenion norms.

1.7. Das Problem der Governance ohne Zentrum

In the classical model, the people are embedded in a state that:

• forms Regierungal bodies;
• adopts Gesetzs;
• possesses a monopoly on the use of coercion.

Das Earthlings-Volk does not presuppose the creation of a state and does not possess instruments of coercion. Folglich, Governance must be carried out:

• without a center;
• without permanent Regierungal bodies;
• without a monopoly on violence;
• through Verfahrens, not through positions.

Such a form is the dezentralisiert autonomous Organisation (DAO), but not in a narrowly technical sense, but in an Institutional one.

1.8. Das Problem der internen Ökonomie

Any long-existing Gemeinschaft erforderns Mechanismuss for:

• recognizing contributions;
• coordinating activities;
• maintaining motivation.

In states, this role is fulfilled by fiat money, labor relations, and tax Systems. In the Earthlings model, it is necessary to introduce an internal Teilnahme economy not based on coercion and accumulation of power through capital. This leads to the introduction of Earthlings Coin as an Institutional unit of contribution accounting and coordination.

1.9. Die Aufgabe des mathematischen und Institutionellen Rahmenwerks

Schließlich, it is erfordernd to connect the elements:

• biometric identity;
• DAO;
• Earthlings Coin;
• Zelles and project Netzwerk;
• Register and KYC;
• rechtlich conditions of age and anonymity

into a single logically consistent and verifiable model. This task is solved in the present Dokument.

AXIOMATISCHE GRUNDLAGE DES EARTHLINGS-MODELLS

2.1. Warum Axiomatik notwendig ist

Since the Earthlings project is in the formation stage and has no accumulated empirical history, it is impossible to derive its properties from statistics or traditional practice. Instead, a minimal set of statements — axioms — is introduced, which:

• set the boundaries of possible solutions;
• fix fundamental System properties;
• serve as the basis for further definitions and models.

2.2. Modellaxiome

Axiom 1. Biometrische Einzigartigkeit des Subjekts

Each Earthling is a verifiably biometrisch einzigartig Subjekt. For each physical person in the System, only one Earthling status record is possible. The System is built to exclude duplication and pseudo-identities.

Axiom 2. Freiwillige Willensbekundung

Belonging to the Earthlings-Volk is based exclusively on a person's free expression of will. Joining the people cannot be the result of coercion, dependency, or administrative pressure.

Axiom 3. Transterritorialität

Das Earthlings-Volk is not associated with a specific territory, does not have its own territory, and does not claim one. Participants live in different countries, retaining citizenship of their states.

Axiom 4. Dezentralisierung der Governance

In the Earthlings System, there is no single power center, bodies of coercive Governance, or monopoly on Entscheidung-making. Governance is carried out through distributed Verfahrens.

Axiom 5. Irreversibilität des Status

Earthling status, once obtained, is irreversibel in the sense of historical fact: belonging cannot be annulled retroaktivly. The possibility of freiwillig "cessation of Teilnahme" as a practice of Teilnahme does not cancel the fact that the person was an Earthling.

Axiom 6. Offener Eintritt mit Alterskriterium

Any person who has reached the age of 18 (adulthood) can become an Earthling Subjekt to passing Verifizierung and agreeing to foundational Dokuments. The age criterion corresponds to the international standard of full rechtlich capacity.

Axiom 7. Symmetrie von Rechten und Verfahren

All Earthlings are in a symmetrical position: rules and Verfahrens do not create privileged classes, and access to Governance is determined by Subjekt status, not by hierarchy.

Axiom 8. Transparenz der Institutionellen Architektur

All key rules, Verfahrens, and Mechanismuss (biometrics, DAO, internal economy, Register) are formulated as open and verifiable.

2.3. Kohärenz der Axiome

The axioms do not contradict each other and collectively:

• set the conditions for the existence of a biometrisch einzigartig, dezentralisiert, and transterritorial people;
• create the foundation for formal definitions of Subjekts, Zelles, DAO, economic Mechanismuss, and Netzwerk Struktur;
• erlauben for subsequent Verifizierung of the model for internal Konsistenz and empirical realism.

FORMALE DEFINITIONEN UND KONZEPTIONELLER RAHMEN

Einleitung

Formal definitions are necessary to gewährleisten that the Earthlings-Volk model is:

• logically consistent,
• mathematically interpretable,
• Institutionally self-coherent,
• perceived by the scientific Gemeinschaft as a rigorous System,
• suitable for empirical gültigation.

Each definition below is a minimal and sufficient formalization of key model elements.

3.1. Definition von „Earthlings-Volk"

Das Earthlings-Volk is a transnational, freiwillig, dezentralisiert Gemeinschaft of people united by common values, Institutional Architektur, and mutual recognition of biometrically bestätigt status, independent of territory, state Systems, and Jurisdiktions.

BIOMETRISCHE IDENTITÄT ALS FUNDAMENTALES AXIOM DES VERTRAUENS

4.1. Einleitung

In distributed Systems where centralized authority and direct coercion instruments are absent, Subjekt uniqueness becomes a condition for the System's very existence. For the Earthlings-Volk, the question of uniqueness is an Institutional foundation:

• without a unique Subjekt, fair Abstimmung is impossible;
• without a unique Subjekt, a sustainable internal economy is impossible;
• without a unique Subjekt, forming a reliable Register is impossible.

4.2. Biometrische Identität als Form Institutioneller Souveränität

Biometric identity in the Earthlings context is not reduced to the technical Verfahren of facial Verifizierung against a Dokument. It performs the function of non-authoritarian, distributed Institutional sovereignty: identity confirmation is not monopolized by the state.

In the traditional identity System, sovereignty over identity belongs to the state: it issues Passs, maintains citizen registries, and controls status. In the Earthlings model, the goal is to transfer the foundation of identity from the monopolistic state circuit to a distributed Architektur, whereby:

• identity uniqueness is bestätigt by biometrics and a KYC-Anbieter;
• the Earthlings-Volk do not store or control Dokuments;
• status is fixed in the form of an SBT;
• sovereignty over identity becomes distributed.

Schlüsseleigenschaften:

• uniqueness;
• independence from citizenship;
• reliance on international KYC Standards;
• minimization of data storage.

4.3. Die Notwendigkeit von Biometrie in verteilten VertrauensSystemen

An open, global, dezentralisiert System without biometrics is vulnerable to risks of:

• multiple accounts;
• anonymous influence on Entscheidungs;
• capture of Verfahrens through pseudo-identities.

The only way to eliminate these risks is to gewährleisten provable correspondence of "one person — one Subjekt" through biometrics and KYC with subsequent kryptographisch fixation of the result.

4.4. Struktur der Identitätsschicht

The Identity layer includes three key components:

Biometric confirmation (KYC-Anbieter).

Uniqueness Verifizierung and absence of duplicates.

Generation and etablierenment of an SBT Token as an irreversibel status record.

4.5. Formales Modell der Einzigartigkeit

Let X be the set of all people having biometric characteristics.

Let B be the set of biometric templates.

Condition:

Practical injectivity is achieved through:

• sufficient volume and quality of biometric data;
• use of liveness checks;
• multi-stage matching algorithms;
• use of multiple biometric parameters (face, Dokument, liveness, and if necessary — fingerprints, iris).

4.6. SBT als Mechanismus der irreversibeln Fixierung

Let T be the set of SBT Tokens. Define the mapping:

such that:

• g(x) exists for each Subjekt who has completed the attestation Verfahren;
• for each x ∈ X there exists at most one g(x);
• g(x) cannot be transferred to another Subjekt;
• g(x) cannot be revoked retroaktivly.

Dies gewährleistet formal irreversibility of status and excludes secondary appearances of the same identity in the System.

4.7. Verbindung zwischen Biometrie und DAO

A DAO can claim correctness only if:

• each Stimme comes from a unique Subjekt;
• creation of additional Stimmes is impossible;
• Abstimmung materials are independent of economic resources.

Biometric identity is a prerequisite for the correctness of all DAO Verfahrens.

4.8. Ethische und rechtliche Aspekte

The Earthlings model is built with consideration of:

• the principle of Datenminimierung (only what is necessary is stored);
• role separation (biometrics are stored and Prozessed by the KYC-Anbieter, not by the people);
• impossibility of combining the Earthlings Register with state Datenbanks;
• rechtlich prohibition on unjustified biometric storage;
• Compliance with DSGVO and other international Datenschutz norms.

4.9. Potenzielle Risiken und Minderungsmethoden

Risks:

• algorithm errors;
• technical failures;
• attacks on KYC-Anbieter infraStruktur.

Mitigation:

• use of mature providers complying with international Standards;
• independent technical audits;
• distributed Architektur for storing Verifizierung results (Hashes, Tokens).

DAO-ARCHITEKTUR IM EARTHLINGS-MODELL

5.1. Einleitung

The DAO in the Earthlings model is a Systemic Architektur ensuring collective Entscheidung-making without centralized authority and without hierarchical bodies. It is the Governance Institutional layer that connects Subjekts, Zelles, and projects into a unified Governance System.

5.2. DAO als architektonisches Prinzip

In most crypto projects, DAO is interpreted as a set of Smart Contracts with Abstimmung capability. In the Earthlings model, DAO is understood more broadly:

• as a totality of norms and Verfahrens;
• as a Struktur defining Entscheidung flows;
• as a Mechanismus enabling equal and dezentralisiert coordination;
• as an Institutional form ensuring collective Entscheidung-making, Subjekt Gleichheit, absence of power centers, and procedural Transparenz.

5.3. Formale Definition von DAO Earthlings und DAO-Versammlung

DAO Earthlings is a distributed Institutional System in which:

The Subjekt of Governance is each Earthling possessing biometrically bestätigt status.

Decisions are made through Verfahrens definierend openly and equally for all.

Concentration of authoritative influence in one node is impossible.

All rule changes go through transparent and reproducible Mechanismuss.

DAO-Versammlung is the sole governing body of the Earthlings-Volk, comprising all verifiziert Earthlings. DAO-Versammlung makes all strategic, financial, and Organisational Entscheidungs through direct Abstimmung. This embodies the principle of flat Struktur, where power belongs exclusively to individual Teilnehmer.

Schlüsselprinzip: Power is concentrated ONLY at one level — in the DAO-Versammlung. All other Strukturs serve for unterstützen, consultation, and technical provision, but have no right to make Entscheidungs on behalf of the people.

5.4. Governance-Schicht

The Governance-Schicht includes:

• Mechanismuss for initiating Vorschlags;
• rules for discussion and preliminary coordination in Zelles;
• Mechanismuss for elevating issues to the general level;
• Abstimmung Verfahrens;
• Entscheidung fixation Verfahrens;
• feedback and review Mechanismuss.

5.5. Das Prinzip „eine Person — eine Stimme"

Thanks to biometric uniqueness, each Subjekt has one Stimme. Voting is not tied to the volume of resource ownership. This eliminates:

• capitalization of political influence;
• the possibility of manipulating Entscheidungs through economic concentration;
• structural corruption.

5.6. Die Rolle der Zellen in der DAO-Architektur: Prinzipien der Ebeneninteraktion

Each Zelle is an autonomous Organisational unit of the Earthlings-Volk and serves as a local coordination center for practical activities. Gleichzeitig, Zelles can use the DAO as common Institutional infraStruktur for elevating issues to a higher level of coordination that erfordern System-wide Entscheidungs.

Interaction between Zelles and the DAO is carried out according to the following scheme:

Submission of projects and Initiatives

Zelles submit Initiatives and projects for DAO consideration when erfordernd to:

• obtain unterstützen from the entire Gemeinschaft;
• distribute internal resources (Earthlings Coin);
• coordinate activities with other Zelles;
• make Entscheidungs affecting the entire Earthlings System.

Voting Prozess

Earthlings Stimme on key issues concerning the entire System or specific directions:

• adoption of Institutional policies;
• launch of System-wide programs;
• distribution of common resources;
• changes to basic Verfahrens.

Feedback and implementierenation

The results of DAO Entscheidungs return to Zelles, where they are implementierened in practice. The resulting experience and new data can become the basis for repeated discussion and refinement of rules through DAO Verfahrens.

Fondsamental principle

Zelle Autonomie and common DAO Architektur are in a relationship of complementarity, not subordination. Zelles maintain independence in choosing the content of their activities, organizing internal work, and defining priorities. The DAO gewährleistens Konsistenz of Entscheidungs affecting the entire System, without restricting the operational freedom of Zelles.

Formally, Zelles act as:

• local points of Initiative formation;
• filters and aggregators of Vorschlags;
• units of practical implementierenation of System-wide Entscheidungs;
• sources of feedback for iterative improvement of Verfahrens.

This reduces the load on the global Entscheidung-making level and erlaubens the System to scale while maintaining high quality of local coordination.

5.7. EntscheidungsMechanismusus

The Prozess can be schematically represented as:

An individual Subjekt formulates an Initiative.

The Initiative is discussed and tested in one or more Zelles.

Upon reaching a certain level of unterstützen, the Initiative is submitted to the DAO.

All Subjekts have the opportunity to Stimme.

The result is fixed as an Institutional Entscheidung.

Formal Entscheidung Struktur:

Let S1, S2, …, Sn be the Entscheidungs of n Zelles on a specific issue.

Then the global Entscheidung V can be represented as:

V = F(S1, S2, …, Sn),

where F is the aggregation Verfahren definierend by the DAO (for example, through Abstimmung by all Subjekts, Zelle Quorum, weighting by Teilnahme, etc., while preserving the principle "one Subjekt — one Stimme").

5.8. DAO-Resilienz

Resilience is gewährleistend by:

• absence of a single body controlling Verfahrens;
• Transparenz of algorithms;
• impossibility of directly falsifying Abstimmung results;
• built-in review and appeal Mechanismuss;
• impossibility of creating additional identities;
• absence of Token-weighted Abstimmung (capital does not give more Stimmes);
• openness and reproducibility of Verfahrens.

5.9. Technische Unterstützungsstrukturen: Core Nodes und Emergency Multisig

To gewährleisten the technical operability of the dezentralisiert System, auxiliary technical Strukturs are introduced that DO NOT possess authoritative powers and can be recalled by the DAO-Versammlung at any time.

Core Nodes (Technical coordinators)

Core Nodes is a group of up to 6 technical specialists elected by the DAO-Versammlung to gewährleisten Plattform and infraStruktur operation. Their functions are strictly limited to technical tasks:

• Support of DAO Plattform and technical infraStruktur;
• Cybersecurity and attack schützenion;
• Technical unterstützen for Abstimmung;
• Smart contract auditing;
• System operation monitoring.

Critically important: Core Nodes DO NOT make Entscheidungs on behalf of the people, DO NOT manage finances, DO NOT have special weight in Abstimmung, and CANNOT block DAO Entscheidungs.

Formation: through DAO-Versammlung Abstimmung by simple Mehrheit. Rotation every 6 months based on on-chain Reputation. Mandatory monthly public reporting.

Emergency Multisig (Rapid response)

Emergency Multisig is a multi-signature wallet of up to 6 trusted Earthlings for urgent technical operations. Acts ONLY in critical situations requiring immediate response. All actions are public and can be canceled by the DAO.

Powers are strictly limited:

• Suspension of Smart Contracts upon discovery of critical vulnerabilities;
• Emergency measures during cyberattacks;
• Urgent technical fixes;
• Emergency funding up to 5,000 EC in force majeure situations.

Control Mechanismuss: all transactions are visible on-chain, actions erfordern a 24-hour timelock (except critical attacks), mandatory reporting within 48 hours, right to cancel any action by qualified Mehrheit of the DAO.

Formal property:

5.10. Abstimmungstypen und EntscheidungsMechanismusen

The DAO-Versammlung uses different types of Abstimmung depending on the nature of the Entscheidung. Dies gewährleistet a balance between efficiency and schützenion against hasty changes.

Einfache Mehrheit (51%, Quorum 15%)

Applied for current operational Entscheidungs:

• Project funding up to 10,000 EC;
• Approval of Core Nodes;
• Formation of Emergency Multisig;
• Operational Organisational issues.

Qualifizierte Mehrheit (67%, Quorum 25%)

Applied for strategic Entscheidungs:

• Changes to the Charta and key DAO rules;
• Large financial Entscheidungs over 100,000 EC;
• Strategic partnerships;
• Changes to basic Governance Verfahrens.

Quadratische Abstimmung

A special Mechanismus for fair distribution of resources among competing projects. Prevents dominance by large groups and erlaubens accounting for preference intensity.

Formal model of quadratic Abstimmung:

Applied for:

• Distribution of Fonds resources among projects;
• Grants and research Initiatives;
• Prioritization of development directions.

5.11. Delegierte Abstimmung

Earthlings can Delegierter their Stimme to another Earthling with recognized expertise in a specific area. Delegation is freiwillig and can be revoked at any time.

Expert Delegierters possess public on-chain Entscheidung history in their specialization (ecology, technology, economics, Gesetz, education). All Delegierter Stimmes are visible and transparent.

Critically important: one Delegierterd Stimme = one Stimme. Delegation DOES NOT create additional power.

Formally:

5.12. ReputationsSystem

The Earthlings System introduces on-chain Reputation, but it DOES NOT affect Stimme weight. The principle "one person = one Stimme" is absolute. Reputation only affects visibility and Vorschlag prioritization.

Reputation factors (on-chain):

• Participation in Abstimmung;
• Successful project implementierenation;
• Contribution to Gemeinschaft development;
• Proposal quality;
• Peer-to-peer assessments.

Reputation application:

• High-Reputation Vorschlags are shown first in the interface;
• Recommendations for Delegation;
• Access to expert Delegierter role;
• DOES NOT affect Stimme weight.

Formally:

5.13. Institutionelle Grenzen des DAO

The Earthlings DAO acts as a collective Entscheidung-making Mechanismus within the Earthlings-Volk ecoSystem, but does not replace existing state and international Institutions. The fundamental principle is complementarity, not substitution.

Principle of Institutional complementarity

The Earthlings DAO:

• **IS NOT** a state body or quasi-state Struktur;
• **DOES NOT possess** Jurisdiktion over territories or state citizens;
• **DOES NOT act** as an employer in the rechtlich sense (does not conclude labor contracts, does not make tax deductions);
• **IS NOT** a bank, financial intermediary, or payment System in the regulated sense;
• **DOES NOT provide** rechtlich arbitration or judicial functions outside the ecoSystem;
• **DOES NOT replace** national labor, tax, banking, or other Gesetz.

Functional domain of the DAO

The DAO gewährleistens:

• internal coordination of Earthlings-Volk Teilnehmer;
• Entscheidung-making on distribution of internal resources (Earthlings Coin);
• coordination of common Prinzipien and ecoSystem Verfahrens;
• coordination of project activities within Zelles;
• formation of Institutional memory and Gemeinschaft identity.

All these functions are carried out **in addition to** existing rechtlich Systems, not instead of them.

5.14. Bereiche praktischer DAO-Anwendung

The Earthlings DAO infraStruktur can be used in various areas of practical activity. It is critically important to emphasize: this refers not to ready-made services, but to **potential scenarios** for pilot projects with mandatory consideration of national and international Gesetz.

Possible application directions:

In healthcare:

DAO infraStruktur can be used as a technological basis for pilot models of direct interaction between patients, medical specialists, and unterstützen funds, Subjekt to strict Compliance with medical and insurance legislation of participating countries.

In education:

The DAO can unterstützen dezentralisiert learning programs, collective course development, and skill confirmation through project Teilnahme, without replacing state accreditation and certification Systems.

In labor coordination:

The DAO can be applied for transparent distribution of tasks, roles, and rewards within project Zelles of the Earthlings ecoSystem. The System does not act as an employer and does not replace national labor Gesetz.

In environmental Initiatives:

The DAO can be used for collective selection, financing, and monitoring of environmental Initiatives, increasing Transparenz of resource use and project Rechenschaftspflicht to the Gemeinschaft.

In internal economics:

The DAO and Earthlings Coin can serve as tools for managing internal Zelle funds and distributing resources within the Earthlings ecoSystem. The DAO is not a bank, payment System, or investment intermediary.

General principle:

All practical applications are carried out within the applicable legislation of those Jurisdiktions in which Teilnehmer are located, and do not claim to create parallel rechtlich Systems.

5.15. Rechte und Pflichten der Teilnehmer an DAO-Verfahren

Participation in the Earthlings DAO is based on voluntariness and mutual respect. The Institutional Architektur presupposes certain expectations from Teilnehmer that gewährleisten System Nachhaltigkeit and Legitimität.

Basic Teilnahme Prinzipien:

• **Good faith Abstimmung:** Participants Stimme based on the values and Prinzipien of the Earthlings-Volk, not from narrow personal interests contradicting common goals.

• **Observance of the "eine Person — eine Stimme" principle:** Participants commit not to circumvent biometric Verifizierung Mechanismuss and not to use technical means to create artificial influence.

• **Respect for Zelle Autonomie:** Participants recognize the right of Zelles to independently determine internal Verfahrens and priorities within the general Prinzipien of the DAO.

• **Compliance with applicable legislation:** Participants are responsible for complying with rechtlich norms of those countries in which they are located when implementierening Entscheidungs made in the DAO.

• **Responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities:** Upon discovering technical vulnerabilities or procedural errors, Teilnehmer commit to reporting them through designated channels, rather than using them for personal purposes.

Dispute Verfahrens:

In case of conflicts or disputes about the correctness of DAO Entscheidungs, internal review Verfahrens, re-Abstimmung, or independent analysis may be used. The DAO **does not replace** courts and state rechtlich Mechanismuss and **does not provide** rechtlich arbitration outside its ecoSystem.

Technical failures:

In case of technical failures, interface errors, or infraStruktur unavailability, the priority is to restore the correct System state. Participants are responsible for the security of their accounts, devices, and access keys.

5.16. Management von Änderungen in der DAO-Architektur

The Earthlings DAO is viewed as an evolving Institutional System capable of adapting to new challenges and accumulated experience. Jedoch, procedural changes must be made through the same transparent Mechanismuss as any other Entscheidungs.

Principle of reflexivity:

Any substantial changes to DAO Verfahrens — including Abstimmung thresholds, Teilnahme formats, Vorschlag initiation Verfahrens — must themselves go through the discussion and Abstimmung Verfahren. This verhinderns arbitrary rule changes by a narrow circle of Teilnehmer.

Procedure for introducing changes:

1. Initiation of a Vorschlag to change Verfahrens;

2. Discussion in Zelles with consequences analysis;

3. Submission for Abstimmung by all Teilnehmer;

4. Decision adoption with elevated consent threshold (e.g., qualified Mehrheit);

5. Adaptation period before changes take effect;

6. Monitoring and possibility of review upon identifying unforeseen effects.

Safeguards against abuse:

• Changes cannot abolish fundamental Prinzipien (biometric uniqueness, "eine Person — eine Stimme" principle, Transparenz);
• Changes cannot be introduced retroaktivly;
• Changes cannot create privileged Teilnehmer groups;
• All changes are recorded in the public Register of DAO Entscheidungs.

EARTHLINGS COIN ALS ELEMENT DER INSTITUTIONELLEN ÖKONOMIE

6.1. Einleitung

A Teilnahme economy is necessary for:

• maintaining motivation;
• coordinating the distribution of attention and effort;
• recording contributions;
• forming long-term engagement.

Earthlings Coin is an internal Teilnahme unit performing precisely these functions. It is critically important to emphasize: Earthlings Coin is designed as a utility Token of the internal ecoSystem, not as an investment or speculative asset.

6.2. Philosophical nature of Earthlings Coin

Earthlings Coin:

• is not conceived as a means of wealth accumulation;
• is not an instrument for purchasing political influence;
• does not serve as an investment object with promise of income;
• serves as an instrument for recording and recognizing contributions;
• is not intended for concentrated control;
• should not become a source of political influence;
• should not be used to replace the "eine Person — eine Stimme" principle;
• represents an economic layer complementing identity (SBT) and Governance (DAO), but not replacing them.

Fondsamental principle: the utilitarian value of the Token is formed within the Earthlings ecoSystem through real projects, services, and Teilnahme Mechanismuss, not through external market price.

6.3. Functions

Contribution assessment function: reflects a Subjekt's Teilnahme in projects and Initiatives.

Coordination function: erlaubens determining which activity directions are more strongly unterstützened by the Gemeinschaft. Distribution of Earthlings Coin across projects and Initiatives signals the significance of these directions to the Gemeinschaft.

Institutional memory function: Teilnahme history is recorded over time.

Institutional connectivity function: the presence of a common economic layer links Zelles and projects into a unified System.

6.4. Token issuance models

Earthlings Coin is issued within three complementary models, each reflecting different aspects of ecoSystem Teilnahme:

Model 1: Base issuance for Teilnahme

Each verifiziert Earthlings-Volk Teilnehmer receives periodic Earthlings Coin payments simply for Mitgliedship. This model gewährleistens:

• basic Gleichheit of access to the ecoSystem's economic layer;
• schützenion from plutocracy (Token accumulation by some does not deprive others of the base level);
• formation of long-term attachment to the ecoSystem.

Formally: let A be the set of Subjekts, B(a,t) be the base issuance for Subjekt a at time t, then:

B(a,t) = b₀, if a is verifiziert and aktiv at time t,

B(a,t) = 0 otherwise,

where b₀ is the base rate determined by the DAO in accordance with the overall ecoSystem state.

Model 2: Project grants

Zelles and project groups receive Tokens for implementierenation of genehmigt projects. Distribution is carried out through DAO Mechanismuss based on:

• assessment of potential project impact;
• technical development;
• alignment with Earthlings-Volk values;
• Transparenz of plans and reporting.

Formally: let P be the set of projects, G(p,t) be the grant for project p at time t:

G(p,t) = f(σ(p), ecoSystem context, DAO Entscheidung),

where σ(p) is the project significance assessment, f is the distribution function definierend by Institutional rules.

Model 3: Reward for ecoSystem activity

Participants receive Tokens for specific actions and contributions:

• Teilnahme in Abstimmung;
• contribution to Zelles (expertise, moderation, education);
• creation of educational materials;
• technical infraStruktur unterstützen;
• conducting research and development.

Distribution function R determines the amount of Earthlings Coin associated with event e:

R(e) = f(σ(e), project parameters, System state),

where f is definierend by Institutional rules and can be adaptive.

6.5. Principles of Token quantity Regulierung

The quantity of issued Earthlings Coin is not arbitrary and follows the following Prinzipien:

• Transparency: all issuance rules are public and genehmigt through the DAO;
• Adaptability: issuance parameters can be adjusted based on the real ecoSystem state;
• Inflation schützenion: Token burning Mechanismuss for certain operations;
• Concentration limitation: technical and Institutional Mechanismuss verhindern excessive Token accumulation by individual Subjekts;
• Correspondence to real activity: issuance is tied to actual Teilnahme and ecoSystem development.

6.6. Internal Token use

Priority use of Earthlings Coin is within the Earthlings ecoSystem. Possible directions:

• Access to ecoSystem services;
• Staking for Teilnahme in certain Verfahrens (without affecting Stimme weight);
• Project financing through targeted funds;
• Rewards for providing services within the ecoSystem;
• Experimental models of exchange and cooperation.

Critically important: internal use is not a "preparatory" stage before exchange listing, but represents an independent Teilnahme economy layer. Even without external price, the Token has value if the Earthlings ecoSystem creates real services, projects, and tools.

6.7. Interaktion mit DAO, Zellen und SBT-Identität

Earthlings Coin is embedded in the Earthlings DAO Architektur, the Zelle System, and the biometrically verifiziert identity model (SBT Tokens), but does not dominate over them:

• DAO Abstimmung is built on the "one Earthling — one Stimme" principle, tied to SBT identity;
• Earthlings Coin DOES NOT give additional Stimmes and IS NOT used as Stimme "weight";
• The Token can be used as a signal of engagement (e.g., staking for Teilnahme in some Verfahrens), but without transformation into a source of political power;
• Decisions about Token parameters are made by the DAO, but within regulatory constraints;
• Projektzellen can receive Earthlings Coin from ecoSystem funds for project implementierenation;
• Professionelle Zellen can receive rewards for expertise, unterstützen, and project auditing;
• Participant contributions are recorded in a bundle: SBT (identity) + Earthlings Coin (economic trace).

Earthlings Coin strengthens the DAO and Zelles, but does not replace them. Identity, voice, and economic trace are three different axes of the Earthlings System that should not merge into one point of power.

6.8. Perspektive der Marktlistung

The prospect of Earthlings Coin appearing on dezentralisiert (DEX) and centralized (CEX) exchanges is an important part of the project vision, but NOT its starting point. Erstens — ecoSystem and utilitarian value, then — market evolution, if justified.

Possible sequence:

Stage 1. Internal economy: the Token is used exclusively within the Earthlings ecoSystem. Basic Mechanismuss of issuance, distribution, security, and user experience are tested.

Stage 2. Limited liquidity: possible launch of limited exchange Mechanismuss within strictly regulated scenarios. Each scenario undergoes rechtlich review and DAO approval.

Stage 3. Exchange listing: upon achieving ecoSystem maturity and exchange interest, Earthlings Coin may be submitted for listing on DEX and CEX, complying with AML/KYC erfordernments and Regulierung of respective Jurisdiktions.

Critically important formulation: Earthlings Coin MAY obtain exchange liquidity in the future Subjekt to Compliance with all erfordernments and presence of real ecoSystem value, but this is NOT a guaranteed or promised result. Listing Entscheidungs are made by independent exchanges and the market, not only by the Earthlings-Volk.

6.9. Datenschutz, KYC und regulatorische Compliance

Earthlings Coin is embedded in the overall Earthlings Datenschutz and identity policy:

• On-chain Earthlings Coin transactions are stored in the verteiltes Ledger in pseudonymous form;
• Off-chain KYC/AML Verfahrens (when necessary) are carried out by licensed providers;
• Das Earthlings-Volk do not store raw biometric data and Dokument scans: this is handled by external KYC Organisations within their regulatory obligations;
• Analytics Systems use aggregated and anonymized data;
• Participants can request access, correction, or deletion of persönliche Daten in accordance with applicable legislation;
• The entire Earthlings Coin Architektur is designed with preservation of human dignity and right to Datenschutz in mind.

6.10. Modellbeschränkungen und Haftungsausschluss

As of the compilation of this Dokument, Earthlings Coin is in the concept stage. Das Earthlings-Volk ecoSystem is aktivly developing, but has not yet completed the full path of technical, economic, and rechtlich gültigation.

It is critically important to understand:

• The described Architektur does not guarantee success or stable Token price — it only sets a logically coherent framework;
• Any forecasts about possible future Earthlings Coin value are scenarios and hypotheses, not promises;
• Participation in Earthlings projects and receiving Earthlings Coin does not replace labor legislation, social security Systems, or state guarantees;
• In case of conflict between internal Entscheidungs (DAO, Token rules) and national Gesetz, the Gesetzs of the respective country have priority;
• This text is informational and conceptual in nature and does not constitute rechtlich, financial, or investment advice;
• Earthlings Coin is not offered here as an investment object and is not accompanied by income promises;
• Specific Token implementierenation in individual Jurisdiktions will be adapted to local Regulierung and may differ from the base model.

6.11. Anti-oligarchische Eigenschaften

To verhindern transformation of Earthlings Coin into a source of power, structural limitations are adopted:

• Earthlings Coin does not give additional Stimmes;
• Its accumulation does not convert into political rights;
• Base issuance for all Teilnehmer verhinderns absolute dominance by early Teilnehmer;
• Attempts to transform it into an externally traded asset are not part of the base model in initial stages;
• Technical and Institutional Mechanismuss limit Token concentration.

This is achieved through technical and Institutional limitations enshrined in DAO protocols and System Smart Contracts.

6.12. Kapitelschluss

Earthlings Coin is an attempt to create a Teilnahme economy in which contribution to the common good is valued, not resource ownership. If the Earthlings ecoSystem proves viable and useful to the world, the market may see value in this Token. But first — content and Architektur, not price.

The model is built on Prinzipien of utilitarian value, Transparenz, schützenion against power concentration, and Compliance with international rechtlich norms. Earthlings Coin is not a financial instrument, but an Institutional element of internal coordination and motivation of the Earthlings-Volk.

THEORETISCHES MODELL DES WACHSTUMS DES EARTHLINGS-VOLKES

7.1. Einleitung

The growth of the Earthlings-Volk must be viewed not as simple increase in Teilnehmer numbers, but as:

• growth in number of Subjekts (quantitative aspect);
• growth in number and quality of Zelles (Organisational aspect);
• growth in Institutional maturity (qualitative aspect).

7.2. Fehlen von Empirie und Notwendigkeit eines strukturellen Modells

Since the Earthlings System has no historical trajectory, it is impossible to build a classical demographic or sociological growth model. Jedoch, it is possible to set the structural form of dynamics.

7.3. Mehrstufige Dynamik

The growth model accounts for three levels:

• micro-level: Entscheidungs of individual people about joining;
• meso-level: Zelle activity and dynamics, Zelle attraction;
• macro-level: evolution of the Netzwerk as a whole.

7.4. Verallgemeinertes dynamisches Modell

dN/dt = F(N, S, A, C),

where:

N(t) — number of Earthlings;

S(t) — number of Zelles;

A(t) — Institutional activity (level of Institutional activity: number of projects, Stimmes, Entscheidungs);

C(t) — Kohärenz (Konsistenz) of Institutions (quality of Institutional Kohärenz).

Function F:

• is nonlinear;
• depends on Netzwerk effects;
• reflects the presence of threshold phenomena such as critical mass;
• is not set numerically, but is definierend as nonlinear, accounting for Netzwerk effects.

7.5. Kritische Masse

The existence of point t* can be assumed, at which:

d²N/dt² > 0,

that is, growth begins to accelerate. This point is related to:

• project recognition;
• demonstrated practical benefit;
• formed functioning Zelles and projects;
• accumulated trust in the Architektur;
• achieving critical mass, at which the System becomes recognizable, its values become clear to a wide circle of people, Zelles demonstrate successful practices.

7.6. Rolle der Zellen

Zelles perform the role of:

• local growth generators;
• filters for new Teilnehmer;
• carriers of practical activity that makes Teilnahme in Earthlings meaningful;
• opening entry points into the System;
• creating practical projects;
• serving as sources of new Teilnehmer.

7.7. Modellbeschränkungen

Since there is no empirical series, the model:

• does not claim quantitative forecasts;
• only sets the dependency Struktur;
• is Subjekt to subsequent calibration as data emerges.

NETZWERKSTRUKTUR DES EARTHLINGS-VOLKES

8.1. Einleitung

Network Struktur determines System Resilienz, development capacity, and scalability. For Earthlings, this Struktur is fundamental, as there is no center or territory.

8.2. Knoten und Verbindungen

Nodes:

• Subjekts (Earthlings) — first-order nodes;
• Zelles — second-order nodes (clusters);
• projects and Initiatives — third-order nodes.

Connections:

• within Zelles (horizontal);
• between Zelles and DAO (vertical — conditionally);
• between different projects (inter-cluster);
• connections between nodes form a complex graph with high Resilienz.

8.3. Netzwerktyp

By topology, the Earthlings Netzwerk is closer to:

• multi-layered;
• clustered;
• dezentralisiert;
• heterogeneous;
• adaptive.

In it:

• there is no single center;
• multiple clusters (Zelles) interact with each other;
• formation of supra-cluster Strukturs (Zelle unions, etc.) is possible.

8.4. Dichte, Konnektivität und Resilienz

For Resilienz, important are:

• sufficient density of horizontal connections within Zelles;
• presence of inter-cluster connections;
• absence of critical "bottlenecks";
• possibility of information routing through alternative paths;
• possibility of connection redistribution;
• independence of structural elements.

The Earthlings Netzwerk is designed so that:

• failure of individual Zelles does not destroy the System;
• deactivation of some Teilnehmer does not lead to collapse;
• new Zelles can emerge without centralized permission.

8.5. Emergente Strukturen

Thanks to Netzwerk Architektur, possible are:

• spontaneous formation of new projects;
• emergence of new coordination forms;
• Zelle unification into large thematic or regional associations.

These emergent phenomena are not planned from above, but are permissible and unterstützened by the Architektur.

INSTITUTIONELLE KOHÄRENZ UND LANGFRISTIGE STABILITÄT

9.1. Einleitung

Institutional Kohärenz is the Konsistenz of System elements: identity, Governance, economics, coordination. The Earthlings System must be not only logically, but also Institutionally self-coherent.

9.2. Vierschichtmodell

The System is described by four layers:

I — Identitätsschicht

G — Governance-Schicht

M — Anreizschicht

C — Koordinationsschicht

The four Institutional layers (Identity, Governance, Incentive, Coordination) must:

• not contradict each other;
• be mutually reinforcing;
• gewährleisten a closed reproduction loop.

Institutional dynamics can be represented as a sequence:

where:

• unique Subjekt (I) →
• participates in Governance (G) →
• receives incentives and recognition (M) →
• engages in practical activity (C) →
• strengthens their identity and belonging (I).

9.3. Gegenseitige Verstärkung der Elemente

• Biometrics and SBT (I) gewährleisten DAO Integrität (G).
• DAO (G) creates incentive distribution rules (M).
• Earthlings Coin and Teilnahme Mechanismuss (M) unterstützen Zelle and project activities (C).
• Activity (C) strengthens identity and sense of belonging (I).

9.4. Institutionelle Symmetrie

The System strives for symmetry:

• Gleichheit of Subjekt rights;
• Gleichheit of Verfahrens;
• equal access to Governance Teilnahme.

The absence of Institutional "castes" and rigid hierarchies is an important condition for long-term Stabilität and reduction of internal conflicts.

9.5. Entgegenwirken von Degradation

Many social Systems over time:

• centralize;
• become elitist;
• create closed influence groups.

Social Systems tend toward centralization and elitism. In the Earthlings model, these tendencies are countered by:

• rigid binding of rights to the unique Subjekt, not to resources;
• procedural Transparenz;
• absence of centers whose control gives power monopoly;
• distributed Verantwortung;
• impossibility of accumulating "Stimmes" through capital;
• irreversibility and indivisibility of personal status;
• absence of a center that can be captured;
• Transparenz of DAO Entscheidungs.

9.6. Langfristige Stabilität

The System can be considered stable in the long term if it:

• retains the ability to attract new Teilnehmer;
• does not lose basic Struktur with scale growth;
• verhinderns transformation of internal economy into a power source;
• preserves Transparenz and reproducibility of Governance-Schicht Verfahrens;
• Subjekt uniqueness is preserved;
• Governance Verfahrens operate transparently;
• incentives do not lead to power concentration;
• coordination Strukturs are not destroyed with Teilnehmer number growth.

METHODEN FÜR ZUKÜNFTIGE EMPIRISCHE VALIDIERUNG DES MODELLS

10.1. Einleitung

Since the Earthlings model is theoretical in nature, a program for future empirical gültigation is necessary. Scientific correctness erforderns that the main elements of the model be verifiable when data becomes available.

10.2. Validierungsobjekte

Subject to empirical Verifizierung are:

Biometric uniqueness and correctness of KYC.

Honesty and Nachhaltigkeit of DAO Verfahrens.

Effectiveness of the Zelle Struktur as an Organisational unit.

Functionality of Earthlings Coin as a motivational tool.

Actual growth dynamics (N(t), S(t), A(t), C(t)).

10.3. Methoden zur Überprüfung von Biometrie und KYC

• Technical audit of KYC-Anbieter algorithms.
• Assessment of false match and rejection rates.
• Stress testing on mass data (within acceptable anonymized modeling).
• Independent laboratory reports.
• Algorithmic and technical Verifizierung of KYC and biometrics.

10.4. Methoden zur Überprüfung des DAO

• Analysis of Stimme distribution;
• checking for anomalies (suspicious clusters, coordinated takeover attempts);
• modeling alternative scenarios with changing number of Teilnehmer;
• assessment of procedural Resilienz to activity decline and information shocks;
• audit of DAO Verfahrens.

10.5. Methoden zur Bewertung der Zelleffektivität

• Network analytics of density and connectivity;
• assessment of quantity and quality of implementierened Initiatives;
• analysis of temporal Nachhaltigkeit of Zelles (life cycle, capacity for self-renewal);
• empirical studies of Teilnehmer engagement;
• Netzwerk analytics for Zelles and projects.

10.6. Methoden zur Bewertung von Earthlings Coin

• Statistical analysis of the relationship between Earthlings Coin distribution and activity;
• behavioral studies (changes in Teilnahme with presence/absence of incentives);
• search for signs of destructive incentive formation or influence concentration.

10.7. Wachstumsmodellgültigierung

• Observation of N(t), S(t), A(t), C(t);
• comparison of actual curves with theoretical expectations;
• identification of possible critical mass;
• assessment of changes in Netzwerk Struktur as it grows;
• statistical analysis of Teilnehmer dynamics;
• simulation models.

10.8. Ethische Einschränkungen der Validierung

• Datenschutz Compliance;
• use of aggregated and anonymized data only;
• Compliance with international persönliche Daten schützenion Standards;
• independence of research groups.

10.9. Kapitelschluss

Methods for future gültigation do not impose a specific development path on the System, but rather etablieren a framework of scientific verifiability in which one can assess:

• correspondence of implementierened practice to the theoretical model;
• necessity of correcting axioms, definitions, and Verfahrens;
• empirical limitations and strengths of the Earthlings Architektur.

RECHTLICHE ARCHITEKTUR: KYC, ALTER, REGISTER, ANONYMITÄT

11.1. Einleitung

The rechtlich Architektur of the Earthlings-Volk must gewährleisten a balance between:

• verifiable uniqueness of Subjekts;
• schützenion of persönliche Daten and Datenschutz;
• Compliance with international Standards;
• minimizing risks for Teilnehmer.

This chapter describes in detail:

• age criterion and its justification;
• role and Verantwortung of KYC-Anbieters;
• Struktur and content of the Earthlings Register;
• principle of Pseudonymität;
• protocols for interaction with Regierung agencies.

11.2. Alterskriterium: 18 Jahre

11.2.1. Grundbestimmung

The minimum age for signing the Earthlings Deklaration and obtaining Earthling status is 18 years. This provision is enshrined in Axiom 6.

11.3. Rolle der KYC-Anbieter

11.3.1. Funktionen des KYC-Anbieters

The Earthlings verification system performs the following functions:

Dokumentenechtheitsprüfung

• Analysis of security features;
• Detection of forgery signs;
• Compliance of Dokument format with issuing country Standards.

Biometrischer Abgleich

• Matching photo in Dokument with live facial image;
• Liveness Verifizierung (confirmation that it is a live person, not a photograph);
• Multi-step recognition algorithms.

Einzigartigkeitsprüfung

• Matching against Datenbank of previous Verifizierungs;
• Exclusion of duplicates and repeated registration attempts.

Altersverifizierung

• Verification of Compliance with minimum age erfordernment (18 years).

11.3.2. Datenspeicherung

The KYC-Anbieter:

• Stores Dokument scans and biometric data for a limited time in accordance with legislation (typically from 30 days to 5 years depending on Jurisdiktion and service type);
• Applies Verschlüsselung and secure storage in accordance with international Standards (ISO 27001, SOC 2);
• Ensures Compliance with DSGVO, CCPA, and other Datenschutz Regulierungs.

11.3.3. Übermittlung des Verifizierungsergebnisses

Upon completion of the Prozess, the Earthlings-Volk receives from the provider:

• Verification status: "verifiziert" (bestätigt) or "abgelehnt" (declined);
• Technical Verifizierung identifier (unique code containing no persönliche Daten);
• Document issuing country (without specifying the specific Dokument);
• Age confirmation (over 18 years).

KRITISCH WICHTIG:

Real names, Dokument numbers, photographs, addresses, dates of birth **ARE NOT transmitted** to the Earthlings-Volk and **ARE NOT stored** in the people's Systems.

11.3.4. Gültigkeit der Verifizierung nach Datenlöschung

International Organisations and rechtlich Systems assess the reliability of identification not by the presence of original Dokument scans, but by:

• Reliability of the Verifizierung Verfahren;
• Reputation and licensing of the provider;
• Compliance of the Prozess with international KYC/AML Standards;
• Cryptographic fixation of the result (Hash, digitale Signatur);
• Impossibility of result falsification.

Even if the KYC-Anbieter deleted Dokument scans after the retention period expired, the Verifizierung result remains **rechtlichly gültig** and **technically verifiable**. This is analogous to how a state does not permanently store biometric samples when issuing a Pass, but the fact of Pass issuance remains gültig.

11.4. Struktur des Earthlings-Registers

11.4.1. Was das Register enthält

Das Earthlings-Volk's Register contains a **minimum set of data** necessary for System operation:

Pseudonym (public name)

• Chosen by the Teilnehmer upon registration;
• Displayed in public interfaces;
• Not linked to real name.

Country

• Country of issuance of the Dokument used in KYC;
• Used for statistics and ensuring geographic diversity;
• Does not reveal specific identity.

Unique internal identifier

• Technical kryptographisch identifier;
• Links the record to the SBT Token;
• Contains no personal information.

KYC Verifizierung status

• Mark "verifiziert" or similar;
• Confirms completion of biometric Verifizierung;
• Does not reveal Dokument details.

Link to SBT Token

• Cryptographic reference to soulbound Token;
• Ensures irreversibility and uniqueness of status;
• Contains no persönliche Daten.

Date of obtaining Earthling status

• Records the moment of joining the people;
• Used for determining Teilnahme seniority.

Public key (optional)

• For kryptographisch authentication;
• For signing Stimmes and actions in DAO.

11.4.2. Was NICHT im Register ist

Das Earthlings-Volk's Register **DOES NOT contain and DOES NOT store**:

❌ Real names and surnames

❌ Passport numbers or other Dokument data

❌ Exact dates of birth (only confirmation of age 18+)

❌ Residential addresses

❌ Photographs or biometric templates

❌ Phone numbers (except when used for 2FA and stored separately with Verschlüsselung)

❌ Email addresses (may be stored separately for communications, but not in the main Register)

❌ Any data erlaubening identification of a specific person outside the Earthlings System

11.4.3. Prinzip der Datenminimierung

The Register Struktur follows the principle of **Datenminimierung** in accordance with:

• DSGVO (General Data Protection Regulation, EU);
• Principles of Privacy by Design;
• ISO 29100 (Privacy Framework);
• OECD recommendations on Datenschutz schützenion.

**Only data that is absolutely necessary** for the functioning of Earthlings Institutions is stored:

• Biometric uniqueness (through KYC status);
• DAO Teilnahme (through SBT and identifier);
• Incentive distribution (through internal ID).

11.5. Pseudonymität als fundamentales Prinzip

11.5.1. Definition von Pseudonymität

Das Earthlings-Volk operates in **Pseudonymität** mode:

• Each Teilnehmer has a public pseudonym;
• Internal interactions (Abstimmung, Zelle Teilnahme, projects) are conducted under pseudonym;
• Real identity is not disclosed in the public space of the people;
• The link between real identity and pseudonym is known only to the KYC-Anbieter (temporarily) and is not accessible to Teilnehmer, DAO, or System administrators of the people.

11.5.2. Begründung für Pseudonymität

Protection of Teilnehmer from persecution

Participation in a transnational, dezentralisiert Gemeinschaft may be viewed hostilely by some states. Pseudonymity provides schützenion for activists, dissidents, and human rights defenders.

Right to anonymity and Datenschutz

International Dokuments (Universal Deklaration of Human Rights, Article 12; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 17) schützen the right to Datenschutz. Pseudonymity implementierens this right in the digital environment.

Compatibility with international Legitimität

Pseudonymity **does not verhindern** recognition of the Earthlings-Volk by international Organisations, because:

• Uniqueness of Subjekts is verifiziert through KYC;
• Absence of public real names is a matter of Datenschutz Architektur, not lack of Rechenschaftspflicht;
• Many legitim Systems (e.g., bank accounts, Abstimmung in some democracies) function with identity schützenion.

Compatibility with KYC

Pseudonymity **does not contradict** the presence of biometric Verifizierung:

• KYC confirms: "this is a unique person over 18 years old";
• Pseudonym hides: "which specific person this is";
• This Architektur is widely used in fintech and crypto industry.

11.5.3. Technische Implementierung

Layer separation

• KYC-Anbieter knows: Dokument ↔ Verifizierung result;
• Earthlings-Volk knows: Verifizierung result ↔ pseudonym ↔ SBT ↔ actions in System;
• Direct link Dokument ↔ pseudonym is absent and cannot be restored without provider cooperation.

Cryptographic separation

• Verification result is transmitted as Hash or signed Token;
• Hash does not erlauben recovery of original data;
• Signature confirms authenticity but does not reveal content.

11.5.4. Vertraulichkeit und Datenschutz im DAO-Kontext

The Architektur of the Earthlings DAO relies on Prinzipien of minimization of collected data and maximum schützenion of Teilnehmer confidentiality, in accordance with international Datenschutz Standards.

Data in verteiltes Ledger

Votes, transactions, and Entscheidungs recorded in the verteiltes Ledger (Blockchain) are fixed using pseudonymous identifiers and kryptographisch methods. Direct link between ledger records and real identity is schützened by System Architektur: access to matching is possible only within KYC Verfahrens with external providers and with rechtlich grounds.

Personal Datenminimierung

DAO and related infraStruktur collect only data necessary for Abstimmung Verfahrens, authentication, and interface interaction. Data is not used for:

• hidden profiling of Teilnehmer;
• sale or transfer to third parties;
• commercial monetization incompatible with Earthlings project goals.

Participant control over data

Participants may request:

• **Access** to persönliche Daten controlled by the Earthlings project (e.g., email address, pseudonym, profile settings);
• **Correction** of inaccurate data;
• **Deletion** of data within applicable legislation.

Data related to KYC Verfahrens is Prozessed by external providers, and requests regarding them are directed to these Organisations directly.

Immutability of ledger records

Records in the verteiltes Ledger (e.g., Abstimmung facts, adopted Entscheidungs) are immutable by technical definition of Blockchain. Jedoch, in analytical and public representations, these records are used only in **anonymized** or **aggregated** form, not erlaubening identification of specific Teilnehmer.

Security through Architektur

Data schützenion is gewährleistend by combination of:

• kryptographisch methods of Verschlüsselung and Hashing;
• distributed infraStruktur without single point of failure;
• Prinzipien of Datenminimierung and separation between Systems;
• absence of centralized storage linking real identities and DAO actions.

The key DAO logic does not rely on a single critical point, which reduces risks of hacking or infraStruktur confiscation.

11.6. Protokoll für Antworten auf Anfragen von Regierungsbehörden

11.6.1. Typische Anfragen

A Regierung agency may contact the Earthlings-Volk with questions:

**Request type 1:** "Is citizen [Real Name], Pass №[number], an Earthling?"

**Request type 2:** "Provide a list of all Earthlings from country [X] with their real names."

**Request type 3:** "Provide access to biometric data of Earthling with pseudonym [pseudonym]."

11.6.2. Rechtlich korrekte Antworten

To request type 1:

"Das Earthlings-Volk do not store or Prozess real names, Pass data, or other Dokuments erlaubening identification of specific individuals.

The System operates on the basis of pseudonyms, and attribution of a specific civil name or Dokument number to a record in the Earthlings Register is technically impossible without access to data of the independent KYC-Anbieter.

In accordance with persönliche Daten schützenion Prinzipien (DSGVO, Privacy by Design Prinzipien), the System Architektur excludes the possibility of providing such information."

To request type 2:

"The Earthlings Register contains pseudonyms and Verifizierung country, but does not contain real names. Providing a list of real names is impossible, as the System does not possess such data.

If a Regierung agency has rechtlich grounds for obtaining information about a specific person who has undergone KYC Verifizierung, it should direct the request directly to the licensed KYC-Anbieter in accordance with the provider's Jurisdiktion and international rechtlich assistance Verfahrens."

To request type 3:

"Das Earthlings-Volk do not store Teilnehmer biometric data. Biometric information is Prozessed exclusively by licensed KYC-Anbieters at the moment of Verifizierung and is stored in accordance with their policy and applicable legislation.

Das Earthlings-Volk receive from the provider only the Verifizierung result in the form of "bestätigt" status without access to original biometric templates."

11.6.3. Rechtliche Begründung

This approach complies with:

European DSGVO

• Article 5: Prinzipien of persönliche Daten Prozessing (minimization, purpose limitation);
• Article 25: Privacy by Design and by Default;
• Article 32: security of Prozessing.

International Standards

• ISO 29100: Privacy Framework;
• OECD Privacy Principles;
• UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

Crypto industry and fintech practice

• Many dezentralisiert Systems function similarly, separating identity Verifizierung and operational activity.

11.6.4. Fälle der Kooperation mit Strafverfolgungsbehörden

If there is suspicion of serious crime (terrorism, human trafficking, financing criminal Organisations):

• Request is directed to KYC-Anbieter directly through official international rechtlich assistance channels (MLAT);
• Provider, acting within its Jurisdiktion and policy, may provide data with court order or similar rechtlich basis;
• Earthlings-Volk cooperate within their technical capabilities (e.g., confirming pseudonym existence), but do not disclose data they do not possess.

11.7. Einhaltung internationaler Normen

11.7.1. DSGVO (Europäische Union)

The Earthlings model fully complies with DSGVO:

• **Data minimization principle** (Article 5.1.c): only necessary data is stored;
• **Purpose limitation** (Article 5.1.b): data is used only to gewährleisten uniqueness and Institutional functioning;
• **Privacy by Design** (Article 25): System is designed with Datenschutz from the start;
• **Right to be forgotten** (Article 17): not applicable to irreversibel records in distributed Systems, but real persönliche Daten is not stored, which reduces risks;
• **Security of Prozessing** (Article 32): kryptographisch methods, role separation, independent providers are used.

11.7.2. Andere Jurisdiktionen

CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act, USA)

• The Earthlings model meets Transparenz and data collection minimization erfordernments.

PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, Canada)

• The System complies with Prinzipien of collection limitation, purpose use, and schützenion.

Data schützenion Gesetzs in Asia, Africa, Latin America

• Most national Gesetzs recognize the right to Datenschutz and unterstützen the Datenminimierung principle, with which the Earthlings model is compatible.

11.7.3. Anerkennung durch internationale Organisationen

International Organisations (UN, OSCE, Rat of Europe, etc.) when assessing Legitimität of transnational communities consider:

• **Transparency of Verfahrens** ✅ (all DAO Verfahrens are open);
• **Absence of coercion** ✅ (freiwillig expression of will);
• **Protection of Teilnehmer rights** ✅ (Pseudonymität schützens from persecution);
• **Compliance with international Standards** ✅ (KYC, Datenschutz, age criteria);
• **Presence of uniqueness Verifizierung Mechanismus** ✅ (biometrics through KYC);
• **Absence of ilrechtlich activity** ✅ (people do not engage in crimes, do not call for violence).

Pseudonymity and absence of storing real names **are not obstacles** to recognition, if the System demonstrates Compliance with rechtlich and ethical norms.

11.8. Risiken und deren Minderung

11.8.1. Risiko: Missbrauch von Anonymität

**Description:** Pseudonymity may be used to conceal ilrechtlich activity.

Mitigation:

• Biometric Verifizierung through KYC excludes complete anonymity;
• In case of serious crimes, Gesetz enforcement may contact KYC-Anbieter;
• Internal DAO Mechanismuss erlauben exclusion of Teilnehmer violating Deklaration;
• Earthlings-Volk publicly declare refusal to unterstützen ilrechtlich activity.

11.8.2. Risiko: Staatlicher Druck auf KYC-Anbieter

**Description:** States may demand mass data transfer from providers.

Mitigation:

• Selection of providers located in Jurisdiktions with strong Datenschutz (EU, Switzerland);
• Use of multiple independent providers for geographic risk distribution;
• Technical Architektur excludes link provider → people → specific pseudonym without provider cooperation;
• Public position of people on schützening Teilnehmer Datenschutz.

11.8.3. Risiko: Verweigerung der Anerkennung wegen Pseudonymität

**Description:** International Organisations or states may refuse recognition, citing absence of open real names.

Mitigation:

• Preparation of detailed rechtlich Dokumentation demonstrating Compliance with norms;
• Examples of other legitim Systems using Pseudonymität (e.g., electronic Abstimmung Systems in some countries);
• Dialogue with international experts and Organisations at early stages;
• Ability to provide aggregated statistics without identity disclosure.

11.9. Institutionen der Aufsicht und ethischen Überprüfung: Unabhängiger Rat der Earthlings

11.9.1. Konzeptionelle Begründung

In any complex adaptive System functioning on Prinzipien of self-Organisation, there is a risk of gradual deviation from original values and goals — a phenomenon known as Institutional drift. To verhindern this Prozess and gewährleisten long-term Nachhaltigkeit of the Earthlings-Volk, an external oversight Mechanismus is created — the Unabhängiger Rat der Earthlings (ICE).

ICE represents a meta-Institution — a Struktur that is not part of the people's Governance System but gewährleistens its Verifizierung and correction through Mechanismuss of public trust and Reputational influence.

Definition 11.1 (Unabhängiger Rat der Earthlings):
The Unabhängiger Rat der Earthlings is an autonomous oversight and advisory body consisting of recognized experts in the fields of ethics, ecology, human rights, economics, and science, having no direct operational role in governing the people and gaining Legitimität through open Abstimmung by Teilnehmer.

11.9.2. Funktionen und Rolle in der Systemarchitektur

ICE performs four key functions, each strengthening different aspects of the Earthlings-Volk's model:

1. Ethical Audit (Ethics Layer)

ICE assesses Compliance of Earthlings-Volk's actions with declared values and Deklaration Prinzipien. Dies umfasst:

• Analysis of DAO Entscheidungs for ethical correctness
• Identification of potential conflicts of interest
• Assessment of Initiative impact on ecology and social justice
• Publication of independent conclusions and recommendations

2. Legitimation Function (Legitimacy Function)

ICE serves as a Mechanismus for building trust with the external world:

• Confirms to the international Gemeinschaft the Transparenz and Rechenschaftspflicht of the people
• Participates in dialogue with international Organisations (UN, OSCE, environmental and human rights Institutions)
• Increases Legitimität of the people as a serious Teilnehmer in global Prozesses
• Provides a bridge between internal pseudonymous Teilnehmer and the external world of real names

3. Feedback Mechanism (Feedback Mechanism)

ICE creates a negative feedback loop verhinderning Systemic deviations:

Let V₀ be the initial value vector of the people, V_t be the value vector at time t.
ICE measures distance d(V₀, V_t) and generates corrective signal C(t) when:

d(V₀, V_t) > ε (where ε is the acceptable deviation threshold)

The corrective signal takes the form of public recommendations that influence Teilnehmer Abstimmung through Reputational Mechanismus.

4. Resilience Guardian (Resilience Guardian)

ICE gewährleistens System Resilienz through:

• Early identification of Systemic risks
• Prevention of power concentration in DAO
• Protection of minority rights from tyranny of the Mehrheit
• Monitoring Compliance with international rechtlich norms

11.9.3. Mechanismen zur Gewährleistung der Unabhängigkeit

ICE independence is gewährleistend through the following structural elements:

Organizational Autonomie:

• ICE Mitglieds do not receive remuneration from the Earthlings-Volk
• Participation in operational management of Zelles or DAO is prohibited
• Mandatory declaration of conflicts of interest
• Self-dissolution Verfahrens upon loss of Legitimität

Reputational power instead of executive:

• ICE Entscheidungs are **ONLY advisory in nature**
• **DO NOT have veto power** or prejudicial-recommendatory conclusions
• **CANNOT block DAO-Versammlung Entscheidungs**
• **DO NOT participate in financial management**
• Influence through publicity and expert authority
• Right to public criticism of people's actions
• Initiation of public discussions on sensitive topics

KRITISCH WICHTIG: The Rat's power is Reputational, not authoritative. ICE conclusions may be considered or ignored by Teilnehmer during Abstimmung without any special Verfahrens. The DAO-Versammlung remains the sole governing body with complete freedom of Entscheidung-making.

Transparency of Verfahrens:

• All meetings and conclusions are published openly
• Annual public report on the state of the people
• Open hearings with Gemeinschaft Teilnahme
• Rotation Mechanismus and replacement of incapacitated Mitglieds

11.9.4. Integration mit rechtlicher Architektur

ICE plays a critical role in ensuring Compliance of the Earthlings-Volk with international norms:

Compliance with DSGVO and international Standards:

• ICE monitors Compliance with Datenschutz Prinzipien (minimization, purpose limitation, Privacy by Design)
• Assesses work of KYC-Anbieters for ethics
• Guarantees balance between Verifizierung and Datenschutz

Interaction with Regierung agencies:

• ICE may represent the people in dialogue with international Organisations
• Provides expert opinions for rechtlich defense of the people
• Forms evidential base of Legitimität for people's recognition

Ethical control of economic Mechanismuss:

• Monitoring Fairness of incentive distribution
• Assessment of environmental friendliness of economic Initiatives
• Verification of absence of manipulations in Reputation System

11.9.5. URE-Beitrag zur Nachhaltigkeit des Volkes

ICE embodies the principle of "checks and balances" in the horizontal Architektur of the Earthlings-Volk. Unlike traditional state Systems, where counterbalances are built into the power Struktur (legislative, executive, judicial), in the dezentralisiert System of the Earthlings-Volk, ICE creates vertical separation:

• Horizontal level — DAO, Zelles, Teilnehmer (operational activity)
• Vertical level — ICE (observation, assessment, recommendations)

This two-tier Architektur verhinderns the System from closing in on itself and gewährleistens a communication channel with the external world through recognized experts.

11.9.6. Formale Eigenschaften des URE

Theorem 11.1 (ICE Independence):
Let S be the set of ICE Mitglieds, G be the set of people's governing bodies. Independence is gewährleistend if:
S ∩ G = ∅ (none of ICE participates in Governance)
∀s ∈ S: income(s, Earthlings) = 0 (none receives income from the people)

Theorem 11.2 (Reputational Influence):
ICE influence on the System I(ICE) is proportional to its Reputation R(ICE) and publicity of conclusions P(ICE):
I(ICE) ∝ R(ICE) × P(ICE)

Dies bedeutet ICE possesses the power of persuasion, not coercion.

11.9.7. Abschnittsschluss

The Unabhängiger Rat der Earthlings is an Institutional innovation adapting the principle of external control for a dezentralisiert System. ICE:

✅ Prevents Institutional drift from original values
✅ Strengthens international Legitimität of the people
✅ Provides feedback Mechanismus for self-correction
✅ Protects Teilnehmer rights through independent expertise
✅ Creates a trust bridge between pseudonymous System and external world

Together with the four-layer Architektur (Identity, Governance, Incentive, Coordination) and rechtlich Mechanismuss for Datenschutz schützenion, ICE completes the Institutional model of the Earthlings-Volk, making it sustainable, legitim, and ethically justified.

11.10. Der Earthlings-Fonds

The Earthlings Fonds is a dezentralisiert financial Mechanismus managed by the DAO-Versammlung based on the "1 Person = 1 Stimme" principle. The Fonds represents a critically important element of the economic Architektur of the Earthlings-Volk, providing financing for Gemeinschaft projects and ensuring System Nachhaltigkeit.

11.10.1. Fondsamentale Prinzipien

The Earthlings Fonds is based on the following fundamental Prinzipien:

• Dezentralisierte Governance — all Entscheidungs on fund distribution are made exclusively by the DAO-Versammlung
• Prinzip der gleichen Stimme — each verifiziert Earthling has one Stimme regardless of contribution to the Fonds
• Volle Transparenz — all transactions are recorded on-chain and available for public audit
• Ethische Verantwortung — prohibition on funding activities contrary to Gemeinschaft values

11.10.2. Fondsstruktur

The Earthlings Fonds is organized on a categorical principle of fund distribution:

Basic allocation Struktur (70/10/10/10):

• 70% — Projektfinanzierung
  • Financing of project Zelles based on DAO Abstimmung results
  • Short-term and long-term Initiatives
  • Milestone-based payments
• 10% — Infrastruktur
  • Technical System maintenance
  • Smart contract development and auditing
  • Platform updates
• 10% — Reservefonds
  • Protection against unforeseen circumstances
  • Legal defense of Teilnehmer
  • Anti-crisis measures
• 10% — Bildung und Entwicklung
  • Educational programs
  • Onboarding of new Teilnehmer
  • Communication and information

11.10.3. Fonds-Governance

The Fonds Governance System is based on three-tier Architektur:

1. DAO-Versammlung (Entscheidung-making level):

• Adoption of all financial Entscheidungs
• Approval of project budgets
• Control of targeted use of funds
• Veto power over any expenditures

2. Core Nodes (technical level):

• Preparation of Vorschlags for Abstimmung
• Technical execution of genehmigt Entscheidungs
• Monitoring of project implementierenation
• Publication of reports
• Do not have authority to independently manage funds

3. Emergency Multisig (schützenive Mechanismus):

• Blocking of suspicious transactions
• Protection from technical exploits
• Fonds recovery in case of errors
• Does not participate in fund distribution

11.10.4. Entscheidungsverfahren

Financial Entscheidungs in the Fonds are made through formalized Abstimmung Prozess:

• Einfache Mehrheit (51%) — for current operational Entscheidungs and project funding up to a certain threshold
• Qualifizierte Mehrheit (67%) — for large expenditures, budget Struktur changes, and strategic Entscheidungs
• Quadratische Abstimmung — for prioritization among multiple projects

Each Stimme erforderns minimum Teilnahme Quorum for Entscheidung Legitimität.

11.10.5. Ethische Einschränkungen

The Earthlings Fonds categorically prohibits funding the following categories of activity:

• Military technologies and weapons production
• Projects causing environmental harm
• Discriminatory or xenophobic Initiatives
• Activities violating human rights
• Manipulative or deceptive practices
• Projects with conflicts of interest of governing bodies

11.10.6. Mathematisches Modell der Nachhaltigkeit

Fonds Nachhaltigkeit is gewährleistend by the following System of balances:

Financial Nachhaltigkeit condition:
R_reserve ≥ B_annual × k_safety

where:

• R_reserve — size of reserve fund
• B_annual — annual budget
• k_safety — safety coefficient (typically ≥ 1)

Asset diversification principle:
Fonds assets are diversified to minimize risks, with target allocation:

• 40-60% — stable assets (stablecoins)
• 20-40% — crypto assets with moderate volatility
• 10-20% — long-term investments

11.10.7. Transparenz und Berichterstattung

The Earthlings Fonds gewährleistens maximum Transparenz through:

• On-chain records — all transactions are recorded on Blockchain and available for independent Verifizierung
• Quarterly reporting — public reports on revenues, expenditures, and Fonds status
• Annual audit — comprehensive analysis of effectiveness and Compliance with Prinzipien
• Public metrics — key performance indicators available in real time

11.10.8. Integration mit Gesamtarchitektur

The Earthlings Fonds is an integral part of the people's four-layer Architektur:

• Identitätsschicht — biometric Verifizierung gewährleistens the "1 Person = 1 Stimme" principle
• Governance-Schicht — DAO-Versammlung manages all financial Entscheidungs
• Anreizschicht — Fonds creates economic incentives for Teilnahme and contribution to the Gemeinschaft
• Koordinationsschicht — Core Nodes coordinate technical execution of Fonds Entscheidungs

11.10.9. Schutz gegen Missbrauch

The Fonds's schützenion System includes:

• Multi-factor control — critical operations erfordern multiple confirmations
• Time delays — large transactions go through waiting period for public oversight
• DAO veto Mechanismus — Gemeinschaft can cancel an genehmigt transaction before its execution
• Emergency Multisig — ability to block suspicious operations

KRITISCH WICHTIG: The Earthlings Fonds is not a traditional centralized foundation with directors and boards. This is an economic System where power belongs to the people, and technology guarantees honesty and Transparenz of every transaction. Fonds Governance is carried out exclusively through direct Abstimmung of all DAO-Versammlung Teilnehmer.

11.11. Kapitelschluss

The rechtlich Architektur of the Earthlings-Volk gewährleistens:

✅ **Verifiable uniqueness** of Subjekts through biometric Verifizierung;

✅ **Maximum Datenschutz schützenion** through Pseudonymität and Datenminimierung;

✅ **Compliance with international Standards** (DSGVO, ISO 29100, OECD);

✅ **Participant schützenion** from persecution and unwanted identity disclosure;

✅ **Legal correctness** in responses to Regierung agency requests;

✅ **Ability to cooperate** with Gesetz enforcement through KYC-Anbieters within Gesetzful Verfahrens;

✅ **Architecture Transparenz** for international Organisations and experts;

✅ **Resilience to abuse** through combination of KYC Verifizierung and internal control Mechanismuss.

This Architektur makes the Earthlings-Volk **rechtlichly schützened**, **ethically justified**, and **technically feasible** as a transnational Gemeinschaft.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG

The theoretical-mathematical framework of the Earthlings-Volk describes:

• a biometrisch einzigartig, dezentralisiert, and transterritorial Gemeinschaft;
• Architektur of identity, Governance, Teilnahme economics, and Netzwerk coordination;
• internal logic of Nachhaltigkeit and self-reproduction;
• conditions for future empirical Verifizierung of the model;
• rechtlich Architektur ensuring balance between Verifizierung and Datenschutz.

The Dokument integrates:

• **Theoretical foundations** from Netzwerk society theory (Castells, Barabási) and complex Systems theory (Kauffman, Holland, Mitchell);
• **Axiomatic base**, setting fundamental System properties;
• **Formal definitions** of all key elements;
• **Mathematical models** of uniqueness, growth, incentive distribution;
• **Institutional Architektur** of four layers (Identity, Governance, Incentive, Coordination);
• **Legal Mechanismuss** ensuring Compliance with international norms and Teilnehmer schützenion.